Category Archives: IRS Fraud

Glenn Ambort on Al Adask Radio Show

Al Adask has invited me as his guest on his radio show, today, August 4th, 2015.

TIME: 9-11 pm EDT (Eastern)

            8-10 pm CDT (Central)

            6-8 pm PDT   (Pacific)

WHERE: http://americanvoiceradio.com/

CALL-IN #: 800-932-1980

LINK to Al’s Blog: https://adask.wordpress.com/

AL ADASK BIO:

*I started studying law after my divorce in A.D. 1983. I’ve been involved in legal reform issues for 32 years.

* One thing led to another and I started publishing the “AntiShyster” news magazine in A.D. 1990.

*In A.D. 1992, I ran for the Texas Supreme Court (which is supposed to be illegal and received 201,000 votes).

*I continued to publish until A.D. 2002 when I was arrested without warrant and extradited without warrant based on two alleged felony counts of non-support of a child. The allegations were fraudulent. I was never actually charged with a crime. I was held for 344 days in a Level-5 Maximum Security Jail and then released.

*The IRS has come after me twice (A.D. 1991 & A.D. 2008). I stopped them both times with the grace of God and a couple of letters filled with relevant questions.

*The Dallas Bar Association came after me for Unauthorized Practice of Law back about A.D. 2000. I stopped them with the grace of God and an eleven-page letter filled with questions.

*In A.D. 2006, I was added as the last of seven defendants in case that started in A.D. 2001 and was based on the manufacture and distribution of a controlled substance (colloidal silver) and prosecuted by the Texas Attorney General. The first three defendants had spent $160,000 on one of Texas’ better law firms to defend them and achieved nothing. Each defendant (including me) was individually threatened with fines of $25,000/day ($9 million/year). I read the relevant law concerning the definitions of “drugs” in both the Texas and federal statutes and realized, with the grace of our Father YHWH ha Elohiym, that the drug laws only applied to animals.     I drafted a freedom of religion defense arguing that I cannot be an “animal” since I am a “man made in God’s image and given dominion over the animals” as per Genesis 1:26-28. The Texas AG, after investing six years and nearly $500,000 in pre-trial investigations and pre-trial hearings, dropped the case.

* I currently co-host two radio shows (American Independence Hour Tuesday nights from 8PM to 10PM Central; and, Financial Survival, Mon-Fri., 3PM to 4PM central.

If you want to read about the Motion to Dismiss based upon the IRS’s False-Return Scheme, filed in the Tax Evasion case, click HERE

ARCHIVE: If you’d like to receive a LINK to the archive of this show, please fill the form below, let me know, and I will send the LINK as soon as it becomes available.

Thanks,

Glenn

Update on Discovery Hearing

Update on Discovery Hearing

The first actual hearing on discovery in the tax evasion case was held on Thursday, March 26, 2015. I spoke with an individual who attended the hearing, and here is what I gleaned from that conversation:

  • The hearing was mostly about discovery of the Master File Source Code, which the judge denied, at this stage of the proceedings;
  • The judge left the door open to additional specific discovery requests based on the discovery which the Defense has already received, including those items provided by the Government at the hearing;
  • The Government provided some additional items of discovery;
  • The Government offered to set up an appointment with the Defense to go over all the discovery which it has already provided, in order to help the Defense locate specific items which the Defense claims not to have received; and
  • A status hearing was scheduled for May 29, 2015.

Discovery Briefs

I have combined the last four discovery briefs of both the Government and the Defense into a single file, a total of 119 pages. The Government actually included a copy of some of the materials on this website in its latest brief with the court.

In its last brief, the Government included, as an Exhibit, a picture of this very website and informed the Court that many of us were watching this case very closely.

The Sixth Amendment reads, in part: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial.” In today’s electronic world, many people choose to follow such “public trials” via the Internet. I shall do my best to keep you informed of the proceedings in this trial, as it appears to be following a course of events which I have never seen before in any criminal tax prosecution.

The briefs are available directly from the court for electronic download if you have a PACER account. I think the rate is 10 cents per page.

You may also download all 119 pages on a DONATION basis, by clicking on the button below.

Add to Cart

Supplemental Discovery Motion – Tax Evasion Case

The Supplemental Discovery Motion for the Tax Evasion Case in San Diego, was filed on Saturday, February 14, 2015.

The main focus of this Motion was to identify to the Court, in easily-understood concepts and language, why the Court should ORDER the IRS to produce the source code (computer program) used to generate the Individual Master File and TXMODA transcripts used by the IRS to generate deficiency proceedings which lead to assessment and collection of income taxes.

For those familiar with the work of John Benson and Michael Ellis, you will see how the research of both men contributed so importantly to the essence of the Motion.

If the Court orders the Government to produce the source code and its accompanying system documentation, the Defense will be afforded a view into the actual computerized means by which the IRS uses false and fictional entries into its Master File computers to make it appear to the courts, the legal profession and the public that those who do not file returns actually did file returns.

The Combined Discovery Motions are available on a DONATION basis by clicking on the button below.

Add to Cart

 

Testimony of Dwight E. Davis, Head of Alcohol & Tobacco Tax Division, IRS

Testimony of Dwight E. Avis, Head of the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division of the Bureau of Internal Revenue

“Income Tax is 100% Voluntary”

Given before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, Internal Revenue Investigation, dated Tuesday, February 3, 1953, page 13:

Let me point this out now. Your income tax is 100 percent voluntary tax, and your liquor tax is 100 percent enforced tax. Now the situation is as different as day and night. Consequently, your same rules just will not apply.

Dwight Avis Testimony

(click to view) (see p. 13, first statement by Mr. Avis)

Reply to IRS Claim: You Are Required to File Form 1040

IRS Claims that Most Americans

are required to file Form 1040.

Is that necessarily the truth?

In December 2013, an individual, we’ll call him Joe, received a CP59 Notice or Letter from the IRS asking him why he had not filed a tax return for the year 2012.

Joe sent an answer to the IRS Chief Counsel, copy to the local Revenue Officer. The Revenue Officer replied, stating, in relevant part, the following:

This letter is sent in response to your letter to me dated 12/31/2013 titled “request for Determination of Tax-Filing Status for the year 2012.” In the letter you state several times you would like to know if you are required to file a Form 1040 tax return for the year 2012 given that you earned in excess of $ __________ during that year. To answer your question, yes you are required to file a Form 1040 for the tax year 2012 and pay any tax due as a consequence of the earned income. If you do not file a return for this, or any other year where you had taxable income, IRS may file a return on your behalf.

Joe then sent a letter in response to the Revenue Officer. Here is what Joe said about the letter which he (Joe) sent back to the Revenue Officer:

I can’t tell you the kind of satisfaction I feel when mailing such a response to these criminal dolts.

It’s what I tried to do w/every past letter.

Unfortunately, I’m not any good at the power-game.

Here is what I wrote back to Joe:

1. You’re agreeing to follow his advice, with reasonable, court-required conditions;

2. You’re polite in your language, so as not to stoke his ire;

3. You do not employ any frivolous issues;

4. You return your answer timely;

5. You invite a reasonable reply from him;

6. You ask for information required by the Merrill Court;

7. You ask for information which he is required to produce;

8. yet will not be able to produce;

9. You have a very nice paper-trail for a judge and a jury, should it come to that, which will appear to them as reasonable;

10. Information which, if not produced now and will not be able to be produced at trial, will weigh powerfully in your favor;

11. All w/o arguing the law in any way, except, of course, for your good-faith attempt to comply with the Merrill Court’s admonition.

For any who receive a CP59 Notice/Letter from the IRS or a response, such as Joe received, you may want to look at the reply Joe sent to the Revenue Officer.

As always, Donate if you choose to, or edit the suggested price to anything you like, up or down, zero to the moon, after you click on the “add to cart button”. We want everyone to have access to all our research.

All proceeds go toward furthering John Benson’s life’s work.

John W. Benson (1934-2014) My Mentor and Best Friend for 23 years. Passed into the Eternities on July 4, 2014, the same day on which Thomas Jefferson and John Adams passed! 

Rest in Peace, my Great, Good and Innocent Friend! I will see you again!

 Add to Cart

Response to IRS Confirmatory Writing – CP59 Notice

Here is how the IRS explains the CP59 Notice it sends out to nonfilers:

Understanding your CP59 Notice

We sent you this notice because we have no record that you filed your prior personal tax return or returns.

What you need to do

File your personal tax return immediately or explain to us why you don’t need to file.

I have drafted a response that an individual used who had obtained from the IRS his Individual Master File (IMF) transcript records.

If you decide that a similar response is appropriate in your case, you will also want to obtain a copy of your IMF transcripts and read the post on this site named “IRS Fraud Used to Enter Substitute for Return against Non-Filers.”

That post will explain how the IRS “doctors” their records to make it appear that nonfilers have, in fact, filed Form 1040A with the IRS.

Form 1040A is a tax return agreeing to liability to the income taxes and permitting the IRS to calculate the amount of that liability without the nonfiler actually doing the computation.

As a result, ALL income taxes appear within the IRS’s computer databases to have been filed voluntarily: (a) those who actually filed voluntarily; and (b) those nonfilers who are made to appear to have filed Form 1040A “consent” returns.

As per usual, you may donate the suggested price ($5.00, or more, if you care to) by clicking on the “add to cart” button below or obtain it free by editing the suggested price after clicking on the “add to cart”, updating the cart, then checking out.

All proceeds go to further the work of John W. Benson.

John W. Benson (1934-2014) My Mentor and Best Friend for 23 years. Passed into the Eternities on July 4, 2014, the same day on which Thomas Jefferson and John Adams passed!

Rest in Peace, my Great, Good and Innocent Friend! I will see you again!

Add to Cart

 

 

Where Are the Constitutional Limitations on the Taxing Powers of Congress Located, Today?

Where Are the Constitutional Limitations on the Taxing Powers of Congress Located, Today?

If you were to go into court, today, and raise the issue that the IRS had used its computer systems and tax codes, tax transaction codes, and other hard-to-understand processes, the result of which was the imposition of tax liabilities and filing duties that you believe are unconstitutional, would you want to be able to explain these issues in language that the court is familiar with and thereby demonstrate that your right to due process had been violated?

If so, read

Where Are the Constitutional Limitations on the Taxing Powers of Congress to be Found, Today?

Add to Cart